Showing posts with label exexgay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exexgay. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

I thought I put this behind me...

(Hello, blog, long time since I've been here, but some things just don't work on Facebook.)

About a month ago, Basic Rights Oregon solicited testimonies from survivors of conversion therapy. BRO is hoping to make Oregon the third state to ban conversion therapy for minors with HB 2307.

I was a little hesitant about contacting BRO because I'm not comfortable speaking publicly (or privately really); however, I figured I've done enough gossiping online about the demise of the ex-gay industry and this was a worthwhile opportunity to actually have an impact and protect LGBT youth. So, I wrote a one-paragraph description of my ex-gay experience and sent it to BRO.

BRO quickly replied and helped me fine tune the testimony that I read to the legislative committee in Salem. I was more concerned about speaking publicly and keeping the testimony factual, concise, and specific to the bill that I didn't let myself ponder my feelings. After all, I left the ex-gay drama eighteen years ago. I am now out to my friends, family, and coworkers. I have left religious fundamentalism. I now have a loving partner who I will be celebrating our tenth anniversary with this year. And I even aired my complaints to Portland Fellowship's leader back in 2004 in a two-hour talk. I've obviously put all of this ex-gay stuff behind me.

As I spent Monday of last week with other ex-gay survivors, I recalled some of those old feelings that I assumed I had overcome. As I started to read my testimony, I heard my own voice amplified in the hearing room. I realized that the last time I nervously shared my personal story into a microphone to a room full of people was in 1995 when I confessed my 'struggle with sexuality' to a Campus Crusade For Christ revival meeting at Oregon State University. As I listened to my wavering voice, I realized that the story it told was sad.

All of the pain and self-doubt came flooding back. I remembered:
--the 19-year-old young guy with optimistic plans about his future and his religious commitment to fix this little problem;
--the nervous joy of meeting other Christians with "same-sex attractions" and knowing I wasn't alone;
--the many hours sitting in one-on-one counseling sessions throughout the Portland Fellowship house and the therapist's office in Milwaukie discovering that I was "sexually broken", "lacking masculinity", "developmentally stunted", etc.;
--the humiliation of sitting in small group sessions in Portland Fellowship's basement confessing whether I masturbated or lusted that week;
--the constant struggle to reconcile the numerous conflicting messages (e.g. 'the goal is holiness not heterosexuality, but you should remain open to (hetero) marriage'; etc.);
--the empty feeling I had after each Portland Fellowship meeting or therapist session that nothing had really changed;
--the embarrassment of failing my courses as I was too distracted to concentrate on non-sexuality/Christian issues; and
--the devastating realization when I 'graduated' from the ex-gay program and left the Portland Fellowship that I was basically a spiritual, academic, and psychological failure who was no longer in the Christian club and without a sense of direction.

How dramatic. I patted myself on the back for emotionally recovering enough to read my testimony and was encouraged by the many supporters and fellow survivors I met at the capitol. However, in the days that followed, I realize that I am still carrying these feelings and doubts. It was enormously helpful to meet and listen to a couple of other ex-gay survivors who know the experience on Friday and Monday. I'm starting to feel less distracted and nervous, but I'm still surprised that occasionally I feel like I'm on the verge of tears or too agitated to sleep or concentrate. Wow, I had no idea all this stuff was still lurking under the surface.

Friday, September 26, 2008

PLGFF: Save Me: B (update)


save me, originally uploaded by machu picchu.

Tammam and I re-lived our ex-gay days at the PLGFF's screening of Save Me (IMDB.com) with Dan. Chad Allen stars as a disturbingly gaunt, gay drug addict who is sent to the ex-gay live-in ministry Genesis after an overdose. Judith Light plays the ministry's Dr. Laura-esque perfectionist leader (which reminded Tammam of one of his ex-gay leaders).

At first, I was a little concerned that the movie's made-for-TV style and soap-sounding dialogue were signs that it was going to be an over-the-top portrayal of an ex-gay ministry (i.e. the funny But I'm A Cheerleader). And the movie did take liberties such as portraying a live-in ministry that apparently caters to only young, white men cast from Abercrombie & Fitch catalogs (Tammam and I agreed that we would have loved to have struggled in such an ex-gay group). However, the movie became more believable after the characters were established and the story was set-up. And it did remind me of much of my own embarrassing attempt to become an ex-gay, evangelical Christian.

The writers and filmmakers seemed to have carefully researched the ex-gay movement and tried to avoid relying on stereotypes and demonizing conservative Christians (although I'm sure conservative Christians would dispute their portrayal). The ministry's leader stressed that the participants are free to leave at any time and her ministry does not change gays -- God does. The movie's Christianese dialogue (i.e. "praise Jesus" in every conversation) was a little gratuitous but it did remind me of my own efforts to say "amen" and use praise talk more during my ex-gay days. I identifed most with the cut-in scenes that showed the participants' self-assessment during their private confession/accountability sessions. They portrayed that much of the harmful messages from ex-gay ministries is self-perpetuated by participants and that it is an internal struggle.

So far among movies, Save Me has most accurately portrayed many aspects of my ex-gay experience. For the gay movie genre, it was a good, enjoyeable movie.


The conservative Christian publication ChristianityToday.com posted a review and interview with Chad Allen earlier this month. The review by Peter T. Chattaway is surprisingly generous and makes some thoughtful observations:

"...and it is striking how one of the film's central relationships revolves around two people who each conform to, yet transcend, a stereotype that each side in this debate may have of the other. Mark's dangerously promiscuous sexual habits are linked to his substance abuse, while Gayle is motivated in her faith and work partly by pain, loss, and guilt. But both of them are still recognizably human, and thus complex, characters...."

Monday, August 6, 2007

ex-gay conference passes with little attention (updated)

Maybe I haven't been searching the right local news sites, but it seems Focus On the Family's ex-gay conference on Saturday attracted little media attention. It's been hard to find much information online about what happened at the ex-gay conference and the reaction to it.

Apparently, the conference did lead the 5:00 PM KATU newscast on Saturday. The short report merely skims the complex issues, but the reporter does attempt to have Exodus/Focus representatives answer some direct and basic questions:

LoveWinsOut?


ANNA SONG, ANCHOR: "They say homosexuality can be cured. A Christian organization called Focus on the Family is in town presenting a controversial seminar about converting gay people."

SUSAN HARDING, ANCHOR: "KATU's Brian Barker is here with more on this. And, Brian, you spoke with both sides about this today."

BRIAN BARKER, REPORTER: "I did, Anna. Focus on the Family used to be more aggressive about attempting to convert homosexuals, but they've toned-down their message a bit. Still, in a place like Portland, there is plenty of opposition."

[REPORT CLIP STARTS]

WOMAN YELLING AT PULPIT [MELISSA FRYREAR??]: "I knew that God was real and I knew that his word was true!"


Clip appear to show the stereotypical screaming evangelist sound bite. On one hand, I sympathize with Exodus/Focus in that the TV report seemed to exploit the setting by reducing the conference to a shrill woman preaching. On the other hand though, it's not an inaccurate portrayal.


BARKER, VOICEOVER: "Inside a church in Northeast Portland."

WOMAN: "A day came in my life where I knew that I knew that I knew that what I was doing was wrong."

BARKER, VOICEOVER: "A former lesbian tells a half-filled room about her conversion to being a heterosexual."

BARKER: "Are you gay or straight?"


Seems like a simple and basic question.


RANDY THOMAS, EXODUS INTERNATIONAL: "I would say that I am a personal on journey."


So, neither gay or straight? Not even an inkling?


BARKER, VOICEOVER: "And outside, Randy Thomas explains the purpose of the Love Won Out seminar. Focus on the Family travels around the country and preaches about homosexuality and Christianity. Some homosexuals, they say, can have what they call an orientation shift and go from gay to straight."

BARKER: "Is that a healthy thing to do really?"

THOMAS: "Well, I -- we don't try to convert anyone anyway. Uh, it's people who determine for themselves what they want for their lives. And for me, its been the best decision -- one of the best decisions that I've ever made."


Wow. The Exodus representative is surprisingly tongue-tied in responding to a relatively simple question: Does your ministry promote something healthy? Seems like a basic question. Thomas's attempt to avoid answering a direct question and interject his personal experience seems like a cult-follower's answer.


BARKER, VOICEOVER: "But across town, at the Shanghai Lounge"

CUSTOMER (NOT SOBER LOOKING): "Ain't going to happen. Ain't going to happen. It's not."


Unbelievably, the reporter drove all across town past inclusive churches, MCC Portland, Basic Rights Oregon, Q Center, etc. and instead went to Old Town to interview a drunk guy. I really do hate it when TV news reporters attempt to get 'man on the street' responses by interviewing people at a bar. Fortunately, the reporter redeemed himself by tracking down someone associated with Love Welcomes All.


BARKER, VOICEOVER: "Many say the evangelical message just won't work. Up the street at the Ainsworth United Church of Christ other Christians preach tolerance."

TERI NOBLE, PFLAG: "Even if a message is couched in terms of love and reaching out, if the essence of what you're saying to someone is that you are not okay and you need to change who you really are to be acceptable to your family and your God. That's an incredibly threatening message. And it does a lot of damage to people."


Good, short, concise statement.


BARKER, VOICEOVER: "Back at the seminar."

BARKER: "Are you here to try to convert gay people?"

MIKE HALEY, FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: "No, not at all. That's not our goal here today."

BARKER, VOICEOVER: "Organizers brought in police in case there were protesters. There often are at these events, but not today."

[CLIP ENDS]


Gee, a little paranoid -- especially considering few people apparently even knew of the conference. Having the cops there must have added to the conference attendees' perception that they were persecuted believers in a godless, liberal city. Does the conference foot the bill for the police? Was there a police presence at Love Welcomes All?


BARKER: "And the conference ends tonight. A group of Christians who oppose Focus on the Family's message is holding a rally elsewhere this afternoon."


Interestingly, the only other news item I could find was a Salem-News.com article that focused mainly on the Love Welcomes All conference. I did see part of the KGW report, but it also focused on Love Welcomes All mostly. Maybe the ex-gay movement is becoming too fringe and discounted to be seriously covered anymore.

I felt a little guilty for not going to the Loving Welcomes All conference. I went to the conference in 2003, but I didn't feel a need to go this year. It's been over ten years since my ex-gay experience and I feel I've 'been there, done that' -- in terms of working through the ex-gay stuff. Of course, I still have an interest in the issue, but it doesn't go beyond browsing the web.


08/07/2007 11:45 AM UPDATE: Revised, added some thoughts, hopefully improved.

Friday, July 6, 2007

controversial "Love Won Out" billboard arrives

Willamette Week's gay columnist, Bryon Beck, posted photos of Exodus's billboard promoting their Love Won Out ex-gay conference in August. It appears to be the same controversial billboard ad campaign Exodus use in other cities.

Interestingly, the ad makes no mention that the notorious Focus On The Family is really behind the conference. FOTF is definitely not a selling point for gays or progressive Portlanders.

Beck makes good point that it is near a high school, but I think it is in a relatively obscure location. I live nearby and don't have travel that street. I suppose with the rare billboard space downtown, it was the closest they could get near the gay bars.

During the last Love Won Out conference, Basic Rights Oregon helped organize a counter-conference for gay-affirming church. I have mixed-feelings about counter-conferences. On one hand, I think Beyond Exgay Survivors Conference pulled-off a great event that got out the ex-exgay story. On the other hand, I know ex-gay promoters believe any publicity is good publicity, so a counter-conference may bring attention to what would otherwise be an fringe religious event.


UPDATE: The Merc's Scott Moore also posted a blog entry about Love Won Out. Oddly, when he called to ask about the conference, the operator wanted to sign him up for the Focus On The Family newsletter -- what does that have to do with "helping" gays?

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

follow-up: Exodus prez no fan of Sawyer (update)

So far, Exodus has not directly responded to the ex-exgay segment on Monday's GMA. They seemed to have backdated a press release that omits any reference to the main ex-exgay focus of the segment. Now, Exodus President Alan Chambers has posted a comment on his personal blog about the segment's presenter:

Chambers On Sawyer

Seems like a really weak way of responding to a controversial story.


04/26/2007 UPDATE: Alan Chambers responded to my allegation that his catty comment was in response to Monday's GMA. He admits that he heard that Sawyer "gushed over the story of Christine Bakke", but denies his comment related to Monday's show or that he even saw it.

Isn't it odd that his ministry would promote a show he hadn't seen? At least he is sticking to his story.

Exodus's delusional/dishonest response to GMA

Seashell at GayChristian.net noted that Exodus has finally responded to Monday's unflattering Good Morning America segment:

ExodusGMA

No mention that the segment really featured a former ex-gay speaking about the ineffectiveness of ex-gay ministries.

I suspect Exodus is either hoping that Christine's and other ex-exgays' stories lose the public's interest or that they are still planning on some way to counter the stories.

Gee, since I mentioned Exodus in my blog, maybe they will say I "featured" them too -- not to mention the many other websites devoted to exposing Exodus' deceptive messages.

Monday, April 23, 2007

Christine Bakke on Good Morning America!

ChristineBakke

Former ex-gay, Rising Up Whole blogger, and co-founder of BeyondExGay.com Christine Bakke was on Good Morning America this morning (video also available on Comcast.net). The story and her live interview with Diane Sawyer were excellent and very sympathetic to the ex-exgay viewpoint.

I'm sometimes concerned that ex-exgays come-off as bitter and hostile, but Christine was very positive and articulate. Good for her!

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Besen parodies "Dr." Cohen's gay cure therapy on TDS

Wayne Besen from Truth Wins Out tried out Richard Cohen's (Wiki) ex-gay therapy on The Daily Show last night. It was hilarious!

Cohen knew that TDS was going to poke fun at him, so he did what I heard (Fresh Air) former TDS correspondents Rob and Nate Corddry advised interviewees not to do. He tried to be funny. Cohen cursed, burped, "shook it off"(?), and attempted to catch a football to prove his masculinity. He also did his startling punching the pillow "therapy" and creepy holding shtick. He ended up looking like even an unreputable, attention seeker. He is so unbelievable, I sometimes wonder if he was paid-off by gay activists to undermine the ex-gay movement.

Here's my favorite exchange:

Jason Jones, The Daily Show: Welcome back to the program. Like millions of Americans, Wayne Besen suffered from chronic gay. It was thought to be untreatable, but one intrepid doctor found a cure.

Richard Cohen, International Healing Foundation: Homosexuality is not a disease. It's an emotional condition that needs to be addressed.

Jones: Meet Doctor Richard Cohen author of Coming Out Straight and America's foremost gay healer.

Cohen: People who are living a gay live can choose to change and come out straight.

Jones: Thank you for setting the record straight, doctor.

Cohen: I'm not a doctor. I'm a certified sexual reorientation coach.

[audience laughter]

Jones: Oh. Well, you're a psychiatrist?

Cohen: No, I'm not.

Jones: But you're licensed?

Cohen: No.

Jones: Jewish?

Cohen: Jewish? Uh, by birth.

Jones: Which is good enough to get him on CNN. . . .

I checked out his foundation's website. He advertises himself as a "psychotherapist" and apparently created the certification counseling program himself. Also, according to a Wikipedia entry, he was expelled from the American Counseling Association and "avoids State licensing requirements by asking for donations to his foundations instead of payment".

Thursday, March 8, 2007

contrasting ex-gay / ex-exgay stories

Last month after the Ted Haggard gay cure proclamation, the Canadian current affairs show, The Hour, compared the stories of an ex-gay and ex-exgay who were both involved in the Toronto ex-gay ministry New Direction. The video was heavily edited to sharply contrast the ex-gay's and ex-exgay's stories:

The ex-gay, Brian Pengelly, is New Direction's youth specialist (his ex-gay story). Pengelly was frank and honest enough to admit that he still has same-sex attractions:

Since I made my decision to follow God, I have not been sexually active with another guy. Um, that doesn't mean I haven't been really attracted -- that doesn't mean I haven't really, really wanted to."

What I found a little surprising is that a Toronto Baptist church hired Pengelly as its youth pastor. I have to believe that such open mindedness is part of Canadian progressism -- even amoung conservative Christian churches. How many conservative American Christian church would hire an ex-gay pastor who admits to still have same-sex attractions?

The ex-exgay, Darin, (his ex-exgay story) went through ex-gay ministry and counseling, became depressed, disillussioned, and suicidal. Like Pengelly, Darin attended a Christian college. However, unlike Pengelly, Darin says that he was told that he would never be ordained because of his 'gay past'. He eventually found MCC Toronto, progressive Christianity, and has started an ex-ex-gay support group, Soul Survivors.

The stories are so interesting and I relate to both. I remember having Pengelly's optimism about becoming 'sexually whole' while I was in the ex-gay movement. I also didn't think it was a conflict to admit that I had still had same-sex attractions because my focus was on God -- heterosexuality was merely a hopeful side effect. Of course, the fact that my sexual orientation wasn't really changing was a nagging thought in the back of my mind. It often seemed that being ex-gay seemed to be more about attitude and acting.

Of course, I really relate to Darin's story more -- especially the story on his website:

. . . I dove even deeper into the ex-gay world and started attending an extreme charismatic church . . .

. . . In the years that followed, I became what the ex-gay movement taught me was the life of a homosexual – a promiscuous lost soul who was unable to love or be loved – someone outside of God’s love. . . .

. . . In an attempt to find some peace, I tried different churches, and different religions, but nothing fit, and nothing destroyed those teachings of the ex-gay movement that haunted me. Deep in my soul, I knew what I was and I knew that God would never love me. I hated myself … and my sexuality.

Yup, I also dove into pentacostal Christianity because it seemed more extreme, authentic, and action-orientated. I also remember being haunted by the ex-gay and fundamentalist Christian messages when I started to consider other theology and accepting my sexual orientation.

Good times . . ., but really it was so long ago (ten years) that much of that experience feels like a distant memory. And yet, I also have to admit that leaving the ex-gay experience was a defining part of my life, so it's hard not to think about it.

(Hat tip: Warren Throckmorton)

03/09/2007 REVISION: I re-worded and cleaned up my original posting.

Monday, February 12, 2007

TDS solves the Haggard instant gay cure mystery

Ted (Former-Colorado-mega-church-pastor-and-anti-gay-activist-who-confessed-to-hiring-a-gay-prostitute-and-buying-drugs) Haggard's recent claim of instantly going from gay to "complete heterosexual" in three weeks has been just as unbelievable as his claim that he never had sex with the male prostitute he hired or used the illegal drugs he bought. Well, The Daily Show's Jon Stewart has finally solved how Haggard was cured.


(Comedy Central video expires 03/06/2007.)

Jon Stewart: A lot of people would say, 'Well, how did they do it? How did they turn this clearly gay man into a heterosexual?' Well it's really very simple. You know when you were a kid and your father caught you smoking?

[audience laughter]

And then he decided to make you smoke a carton?

[audience laughter]

Uh, Ted's been a busy boy. Mmmmm. . . . And he kept saying, 'Just one more.'

(Hat Tip: I heard The Daily Show excerpt on NPR's Weekend America which was referenced by Ex-gay Watch.)

(02/12/2007 PM: minor editing/revision.)

Sunday, January 28, 2007

""ex-exgay"" actor revealed?

Over the past several days, there are have been several theories about who Donnie Davies really is. Practically any husky unknown actor/musician/performer has been suspected, but none of the photo comparisons seemed to match until yesterday. A JoeMyGod blog reader has matched actor Joey Oglesby's photo to Donnie Davies.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

shockingly hilarious (& offensive?) ""ex-gay"" music video (updated)

The Bible Says

Add to My Profile | More Videos

Reformed homosexual Donnie Davies is spreading the word with his band, Evening Service, and his ministry, Love God's Way. Davies has also developed a program for those struggling with same-sex attractions: CHOPS: CHANGING HOMOSEXUALS into ORDINARY PEOPLE. Also, his ministry offers a help list of gay bands like Frank Sinatra so parents can keep track of what their kids are listening to.


I'm pretty sure this is a parody of some sort. It should be interesting to find out who is really behind it.

(Hat tip: WThrockmorton.com)


01/25/2007 UPDATE: "Donnie Davies" seems to be succeeding in getting attention (Andrew Sullivan) and provoking controversy over whether his parody is funny and/or offensive. Dan Savage has an interesting thought about this parody:

. . .
Donnie Davies is a kidder and an asshole.

Are you with me? It’s a hoax but Davies—or the man playing him—mean every last word. Davies is trying to be funny—heaven’s “back door,” thanking Andrew Sullivan for “getting behind [him],” kneeling next to the guy at the control board—but he means it when sings “God hates a fag.” He may not be ex-gay (those desperate dudes don’t have a sense of humor about their predicament), but a straight religious bigot with a sense of humor. We’re watching this video—all of us secular urban hipsters—because it’s hilarious. Which means that Donnie, through the use of humor, is reaching people that he might not otherwise. And his message is this: Laugh your asses off, sinners, but the bible says a man should not lay with a man.
. . .

Although Davies may be an asshole, I'm not sure a self-parody is very effective.

Monday, November 20, 2006

ExGayWatch exposes Exodus' misleading statements

ExGayWatch.com posted this great presentation about Randy Thomas' misleading statement on the Adam Carolla show. Also, Peterson Toscano transcribed a portion of the interview in which Thomas asserts that participants must voluntary participate and that Exodus ". . . respect a person's right to self-determination."

Although it's still early, Exodus and Thomas have ignored EGW's criticism. I would assume their position would be that Thomas was only referring to adult participants and that minors may be forced into their programs under the guise of parenting.

Monday, September 4, 2006

Tanya Erzen's Straight To Jesus

As I mentioned previously, I finished Tanya Erzen's book, Straight To Jesus: Sexual and Christian Conversions in the Ex-gay Movement, last week. This is the second recent book on the ex-gay movement I've read in the last few years. The other, Wayne Besen's 2003 book, Anything But Straight, was written from a critical activist's perspective and focused on the many ex-gay scandals. Erzen takes a more ethnographic approach that tries to understand ex-gays' perspectives. She spent over a year studying Frank and Anita Worthen's New Hope ministry, its 15 live-in male participants during 2000 and 2001, and the 2000 Exodus International conference.

Here are a few of the interesting and entertaining things I learned from Erzen's book:

  • New Hope drop-outs and drama: Ex-gay ministries rarely release statistics or discuss success rates. So it is very unusual for New Hope to allow Erzen the ability to personally witness the progress of their live-in participants and interview past participants. Seven participants did not make it through the program [page 217] who either voluntarily left or were asked to leave after confessing some violation. I don't believe the book explained all of the departures, but I may have lost track of all the people Erzen named.

    In addition, "Curtis" the youngest participant and frequent subject in the book purposely overdosed on Vicodin so he could be hospitalized and temporarily get out of the program. He claimed it was not a suicide attempt [page 102] and did complete the program; however, Erzen reveals early in the book that he accepted his gay identify after leaving the program.

    Disturbingly, another participant and leader in training, "Paul", was found dead in his hotel room while on a business trip. Paul was a former drug user who followed his ex into New Hope. While Frank and Anita Worthen claimed his death was caused by a heart attack, there was no autopsy. Erzen seemed frustrated by the lack of details regarding Paul's death and puzzled by New Hope's muted reaction. [Pages 123-124]

  • F.A.G.: Exodus International was originally named Free All Gays but "was quickly scrapped after the organizers realized the potential contradictions of its acronym" [page 33]. I have a hard time believing this, but Erzen doesn't seem to be joking. (This too-good-to-be-true naming mistake reminds me of the Film Actors Guild in the movie Team America).

  • "Lots of Action": Frank Worthen admits that Love In Action and Exodus experienced many sexual scandals in the 1970s and 1980s. He even joked that LIA meant "Lots of Action" [page 27]. Erzen does mention many of the early ex-gay scandals such as Michael Bussee and Gary Cooper's affair [pages 34-35]. She also notes that there were media reports claiming men that promoted ex-gay change "had sex with each other at night during Exodus conferences" [page 163]. Erzen questions Worthen about Exodus' early problems: "Frank [Worthen] was vague and uncomfortable talking about this period in Exodus's history. 'We had a terrible time the first few years. One of the reasons I wanted Exodus to become an organization was because I wanted to set a standard of ethics for that kind of ministry. Most of the people were in it for their own needs. They were lonely, they felt guilty and stayed on the fence and started ministries that should never have been started. We had a terrible time--a terrible time, initially'." [page 35]

  • Smid Abruptly Moved LIA: In 1994, while Worthen was building ex-gay ministries outside of the country, Smid abruptly relocated the ex-gay ministry Worthen founded, Love In Action, from San Rafael, CA, to Memphis, TN. Worthen returned to the U.S. and continued the San Rafael ex-gay ministry under the New Hope name. Understandably, Worthen and Smid's relationship was strained after the split [page 38-40]. Now, as LIA's current executive director, Smid is infamous for another heavy-handed tactic: forcing gay teens into ex-gay programs like Zack Stark [page 50].

  • Worthen Was LIA's Landlord: In re-counting LIA's abrupt 1994 relocation, Erzen explains that Frank Worthen personally owned the LIA live-in program properties and lived off the rents. Erzen doesn't explore this unusual arrangement or how Worthen came to own the apartment complexes. While Worthen stresses the importance for ex-gay ministries to have oversight and standards, it's hard to believe any nonprofit or church board of directors would allow an organization's executive to also act as its landlord. This could be a contributing factor to Smid's decision to relocate LIA out of Worthen's control. [pages 38-39]

  • Spitzer Admitted to Skewing 2001 Study: Erzen met Dr. Robert Spitzer in 2000 while he was working on his 2001 study of ex-gays. She recounts: "Over lunch, he had admitted to experiencing difficulties in finding respondents for his study, and he had warned ex-gay leaders that if they did not refer more people, he would be unable to write a positive study for them" [page 130, bold added]. Erzen also echoes many of the criticisms raised about the study's methodology such as: "Inevitably, Exodus had sent him the names of men and women who direct ministries, which raised questions about how people represent themselves if they feel a responsibility to legitimate the ex-gay movement" [page 131]. While I've heard (and expressed criticism) about Spitzer's study's methodology, bias, and significance, this is the first I've heard Spitzer blatantly admit to fixing his own study's outcome.

  • Spitzer's view on homosexuality: While she acknowledges Spitzer's leadership role in removing homosexuality from the DSM in 1973 and his support of gay civil rights, he also did not believe that homosexuality was normal and called it "suboptimal" [page 142] even after the landmark DSM decision.

  • "homodysphilia" and "dyshomophilia": Spitzer coined a new term that would seem to describe "ex-gays": "In 1975 Spitzer developed another term, 'homodysphilia', that applied to homosexuals who were distressed by their sexual orientation . . ." [page 142]. Spitzer later changed the term to dyshomophilia "lumping it with fetishism, zoophilia, pedophilia, voyeurism, and sexual sadism" [page 142]. I'm surprised the Religious Right and Exodus have not yet adopted these terms. Since no one on either side of the pro-gay/anti-gay debate seems to really think "ex-gay" is an accurate term, homodysphilia or dyshomophilia would seem to solve some terminology issues.

While Erzen does mention many ex-gay scandals that have occurred since the ex-gay movement's origins in the 1970s, these are not the book's main focus. So if you're seeking a book about ex-gay scandals, you may be little disappointed. Rather, the book tries to convey what it is like to be in an 24/7 ex-gay ministry, and the history, psychology, religion, and politics surrounding the ex-gay movement.

The book did remind me of my own ex-gay experience and provides a glimpse into the internal conflicts of ex-gay life. The ex-gay lifestyle is certainly confusing, frustrating and humiliating while at the same time there are spiritual moments and camaraderie. I certainly empathizedd with the participants described in the book and Erzen seemed to as well.

As an ex-exgay, I admit my own bias against the ex-gay movement. So, I was a little frustrated by Erzen's seemingly objective approach. That's not to say the book was naive or did not question ex-gay claims and methods, but it didn't demand answers to the questions I would have asked. Overall, though, I think this book provides probably one of the most objective and accurate views inside the ex-gay movement.

Friday, June 9, 2006

'Truth Wins OUT' launched this week

Wayne Besen launched a new organization this week to counter the ex-gay movement: Truth Wins OUT. The timing is appropriate since earlier this week the Bush, Jr., Administration invited Exodus leaders to a White House event promoting the anti-gay constitutional amendment publicity stunt. It seems the ex-gay movement may be nearing the peak of it's visibility and influence. I like TWO's goals: "Counter Right Wing Propaganda" and "Expose The ‘Ex-Gay’ Myth". I hope it can be developed into something more than Besen's personal project. I have heard several former ex-gay activists talk about the need to have ex-ex-gays ready to respond to ex-gay claims. It appears TWO is going to try to fulfill this need.

Sunday, August 21, 2005

re: what does ex-gay mean

Comment submitted to ex-gay Ben's blog, scatteredwords.com, in response to his post, what does exgay mean?: As pointed out by Nick, the definition of "ex-gay" depends on one's definition of "gay". I believe "gay" is most often used to describe people who have mostly same-sex attractions - regardless if their attractions are wanted or unwanted. However, in the context of one's ex-gay struggle, "gay" means self-acceptence of same-sex attractions. Therefore, "ex-gay" would mean someone who no longer accepts their same-sex attractions as in, "I'm no longer identify myself as gay." However, "ex-gay" doesn't necessarily mean loss of same-sex attractions. Most ex-gay ministries I know of are very careful to insert disclaimers into their programs that the purpose of their ministries is not to turn homosexuals into heterosexuals. (And yet, ex-gays who are heterosexually married are more often promoted as successful examples than single ex-gays who continue to struggle.) Many ex-gay promoters like to use the alcoholics analogy -- especially when responding to low ex-gay success rates and ex-exgays. The important difference is that the first step for most alcoholics is to take on the identify of an "alcoholic" and to understand that it will be a life-long characteric (hence, "one day at a time"). Although most ex-gays admit continuing same-sex attractions, I don't believe most ex-gay ministries describe the ex-gay lifestyle as a daily, life-long struggle (or battle) as recovering alcoholics might. So, I would say "ex-gay" describes a person's particular viewpoint regarding their same-sex attractions. The ex-gay ministry I attended was very reluctant to use the "ex-gay", because its definition isn't quite clear. But they did use term because it was a convenient short-hand term than "homosexual-who-is-striving-toward-sexually/spiritual-wholeness". Norm!